What Was So Special About Friday Night

A man retired at 41 with more money than most people earn in several lifetimes, and the first thing his freedom took from him was the weekend. "The weekend would come and I would wonder how I could...

A man retired at 41 with more money than most people earn in several lifetimes, and the first thing his freedom took from him was the weekend. "The weekend would come and I would wonder how I could enjoy it when I didn't work all week," he remembered. "What was so special about Friday night?"

The man appears as Steve Ross, not his real name, one of the anonymized founders Judy Martel interviewed for The Dilemmas of Family Wealth: Insights on Succession, Cohesion, and Legacy (Bloomberg Press, 2006), her study of how wealthy families survive succession, sudden liquidity, and each other. Ross had built two successful businesses and always said he wanted the business to work for him rather than the other way around. He meant it. He sold. And then he discovered that Friday night was never special because of Friday. It was special because of Monday through Friday. Remove the work and the rest does not become one long weekend. It becomes one long Tuesday afternoon, stretching to the horizon.

Ross is candid about how badly the first year went. "It was about a year's transition," he says, "and I didn't enjoy it the way I could have because there was some anxiety." He worried about the thing every newly moneyed parent worries about, instilling a work ethic in children while he himself was not working. He even moved his family to a Florida town full of retirees and found the culture inverted: "In our small town, if you went out to play golf at the club on a Tuesday morning, people would gossip. Where we are now, if you go to work on a Tuesday morning, people will gossip."

You do not need to have sold a company to recognize this man. He is every founder the year after the handover, every civil servant the month after the send-off party, every mother the week after the last child leaves for university. The question he asked is the question this article answers: when the work that organized your life is finished, what organizes it next? Martel's book, read across its chapters, offers something better than sympathy. It offers three deliberate second chapters, with living examples of each. The mistake is not retiring. The mistake is drifting into the next phase instead of choosing it.

Purpose does not retire with you, so a second chapter has to be chosen, not drifted into.

The deep mistake in most pictures of retirement is arithmetic: it treats purpose as something you accumulate, like money, so that enough success should buy a purposeless rest. Ross's testimony says otherwise. "It was a huge challenge to find meaning and fulfillment in nonfinancial activities," he admits, and this from a man whose finances could underwrite any activity on earth. Purpose, it turns out, behaves less like a balance and more like a harvest. It comes from what you are currently cultivating, not from what you once stored.

Jay Hughes, the retired estates attorney whose thinking anchors much of Martel's book, reaches outside the Western retirement script entirely for a better frame. "The Hindus believe that our path in this life is to evolve to a deeper place in the universe, and to live each stage fully and completely," he says. "So the day your first grandchild is born, you can begin to live the third stage of life, which is spiritual development." We quote the teaching as Hughes gives it, from a tradition that is neither his nor ours, because the structure underneath it travels well: life is staged, each stage has its own proper work, and the work of the later stage is not a smaller version of the earlier one. It is a different kind entirely. The builder's stage ends. The stage of depth begins. A person who tries to live stage two forever, or who lives stage three as an empty room, has misread the map.

Most African traditions carry the same map under different names. The elder is not a retired builder; the elder holds a distinct office, with its own duties: counsel, memory, blessing, judgment. Which means the founders we write for are not inventing a second chapter from nothing. They are choosing which room of an existing house to occupy. Martel's book, without ever using this language, ends up furnishing three of those rooms.

The first room belongs to the chronicler, and one woman found it in her grandfather's attic.

Martel tells the story of a fourth-generation member of a business family, called Colleen Donaldson in the book, not her real name, whose family was preparing to liquidate the company that had defined them for a century. Donaldson feared losing more than the firm. "The business was like another member of the family because it was so pervasive," she says. Many of the family's stories had lived only in her grandfather's memory, and he had passed on, leaving the stories one fragile link from extinction: "Now that my grandfather has passed on, a lot of these memories reside only with my father."

Then, while cleaning her grandparents' attic, she found a journal her grandfather had written as a boy of 13, recording his travels across the country with his own father on business. "It was interesting to read these personal accounts," she says, "because it puts our country's history in perspective through a personal lens from our family." The find turned her into the family's chronicler. She proposed that the family gather every story each member had heard or lived, before those too went the way of the grandfather's memories. Her line for it deserves keeping: "There are pieces of history locked in everyone's closet, attic, and in each of our minds. I'm interested in getting the key to unlock these stories."

Here is the point for a founder staring down an empty calendar: the chronicler's work cannot be done by anyone junior to you. The young do not know which stories matter, and they were not there. You were. A founder or elder who spends the next decade recording how the family actually made it, the failures included, the debts included, the names of the people who helped, is not filling time. She is manufacturing the one asset the next generation cannot buy back once it is gone.

The second and third rooms belong to the mentor and the giver, and one man is living in both.

The book's fullest portrait of a chosen second chapter is Jim Liautaud, the Chicago entrepreneur whose family story runs through several of Martel's chapters. Liautaud built companies, declined to hand them to his sons to run, and famously funded his son Jimmy John's sandwich business with a structured loan rather than a gift. What concerns us here is what the father did after the building years. He expanded his own father's retreat in Wisconsin into a camp where his children and grandchildren spend their summers together, building what he calls lifetime memories. He devotes himself to promoting philanthropy in the family name and to writing poetry and essays chronicling the family's history. And he names the stage he is in with a grin borrowed from antiquity: "I am now living Cicero's fourth season of life," he says, "overindulging in all the low-hanging fruits of my past life, living it totally selfishly, and only with those I cherish and love the most."

Notice that Liautaud's "selfishness" consists of mentoring, giving, chronicling, and hosting. He has simply stopped pretending these are sacrifices. That is what a well-chosen second chapter feels like from the inside: not duty, appetite.

The mentor's room and the giver's room each have their own disciplines, and Martel's experts mark the boundaries. The founder who mentors the next generation's builders must lend wisdom without imposing will; the founder who leads the family's giving must build it with the family rather than announce it to them, a lesson the Liautaud family itself learned the hard way, and one we treat fully in another article in this series. But both roles share the essential property Ross was missing: they demand you on Monday morning. Somebody is expecting you. Something unfinished needs you. Friday night means something again because the week meant something.

A family without its company must redefine itself, and so must the founder who led it.

There is one more scene in Martel's book that belongs here, because it widens the lens from the founder to the whole family. Gerald Le Van, a family wealth mediator, urges families who have sold a business to form a family council precisely at the moment the company disappears, because the company was carrying more than revenue. "So often the business is the family identity, the community image. It's the heritage, so now who are we? We are a rich family without a company, and we have to redefine ourselves." A successful council, he says, becomes in effect the family's new company, coordinating its wealth with its relational estate, the web of history and relationships that connects the generations.

Substitute "rich" honestly for whatever your family's scale is, because Martel's book assumes portfolios in the tens of millions and most families reading this are working with a business, some land, and savings. The principle is scale-proof. When the farm is sold, the shop passed on, the practice closed, the family loses its organizing project at the same moment the founder loses hers, and both need a deliberate replacement. The founder's second chapter and the family's second identity are the same construction project, and the founder is the natural general contractor. Choosing to be the chronicler, the mentor, or the leader of the family's giving is not just self-rescue. It hands the whole family its next shared work.

The book stops here. We go one step further. A choice this important should be written down, and not privately. The founder who has chosen a second chapter should say so in the family's founding documents, in the same place the family records what it believes and intends. This is exactly what a Legacy Statement in LegacyPot is for: alongside the family's values and intentions, a founder can record, in her own words, what her next season is for, so the family stops guessing whether Mum is fine and starts supporting what Mum is building.

The decision

If your building years are ending, or ended years ago and left you circling, do this before the month is out. Sit with Ross's question honestly: what was special about Friday night, and what has to be true of your weeks for it to be special again? Then choose a room, on purpose, out loud. Chronicler: commit to recording the family's story, starting with the one only you know, and set a date for the first recording session. Mentor: pick the one younger builder in your family whose dream you will serve without steering, and tell them so. Giver: convene the family and begin designing its giving together, with you as its first servant rather than its last word.

Then write the choice into your Legacy Statement, dated and signed, where your children and their children will read it. Not because a document creates purpose, but because a declared season is a season the whole family can honor, join, and hold you to.

Ross eventually found his way to something like this. He involved his children in building the family's foundation, taught them budgets, and let them watch him work at things that mattered again. The anxiety of that first drifting year did not return. The general found his next post. The question that haunted his weekends got its answer, and it is the same answer available, without a single dollar of his fortune, to any founder reading this: Friday night is special when the week serves something. Choose what your weeks serve next.

Keep reading

  • The General Who Just Retired
  • The Gift That Caused a Rift
  • The Poet and the Soldier

Keep reading

  • The General Who Just Retired
  • The Gift That Caused a Rift
  • The Poet and the Soldier